What Are Stablecoins and How Do They Work?

TL;DR (skip if you love details)

#

• A stablecoin is a crypto token designed to hold a steady price (typically $1 USD) so you can move money online without the volatility of Bitcoin or altcoins.
• There are three broad designs: fiat-backed (cash/T-bills in reserves), crypto-backed (over-collateralized with on-chain assets), and algorithmic (incentive-based supply mechanics—many have failed).
• My personal pick for payments right now is RLUSD (Ripple USD), a newer, enterprise-grade USD stablecoin issued by Ripple and live on XRP Ledger (XRPL) and Ethereum. It focuses on transparency, redeemability, and practical payments utility.
• Popular names you’ll encounter everywhere: USDT (Tether), USDC (Circle), RLUSD (Ripple). Each has different trade-offs in liquidity, disclosures, chains, and policy posture.
• Stablecoins can beat bank money for speed, 24/7 settlement, global reach, and programmability—but you still carry issuer, de-peg, regulatory, and smart-contract risks. Read the fine print.

Why I Care About Stablecoins (and Why You Might Too)

#

I’ve sent money across borders enough times to feel the pain: delays, arbitrary cut-off times, mystery fees, and bank holidays that don’t care you’ve got a deadline. Stablecoins felt like internet-native cash the first time I used them—send now, settle in seconds, any day, any hour. Once you experience that, the old “we’ll process your transfer Monday” era feels like dial-up internet.

This guide is my plain-English walkthrough of what stablecoins are, how they hold $1, where they shine in real life, and how I personally use them. I’ll also explain Ripple, Ripple Labs, XRP, and the XRP Ledger (XRPL), because RLUSD is currently my favourite stablecoin for payments and settlement.

What Is a Stablecoin? (Beginner-friendly definition)

#

A stablecoin is a digital token that aims to track a reference value—most often $1 USD—so you get the speed and programmability of crypto without crypto’s price swings. Broadly, there are three models:

1. Fiat-backed (custodial) A company issues tokens while holding cash and cash equivalents—usually demand deposits and short-dated U.S. Treasuries—in reserves. In normal conditions, eligible customers can redeem 1 token for $1 with the issuer. Examples: USDC, USDT, RLUSD.

2. Crypto-backed (on-chain collateral) You mint a “dollar” token by locking more than a dollar’s worth of crypto (e.g., 150% collateral). If collateral value drops, automated liquidations protect solvency. The peg relies on conservative collateral ratios, deep liquidity, and robust oracles.

3. Algorithmic (unbacked or partially backed) The peg depends on market incentives and supply adjustments—often using a second token. A few worked until stress hit; several collapsed dramatically (TerraUSD is the cautionary tale), so I treat this flavor with extra skepticism.

How Do Stablecoins Maintain the $1 Peg?

#

1) Reserve-backed (fiat-backed)

#

Issuers mint 1 token for each $1 (or equivalent) they hold in segregated reserves. They publish attestations or similar disclosures and lay out redemption policies/eligibility. The peg is upheld by confidence in reserves and arbitrage: if the token trades at $0.99, market makers can buy and redeem for $1, pocketing the difference—nudging the price back to par.

2) Crypto-collateralized

#

A smart contract issues $1 tokens against more than $1 of crypto. If collateral value falls, the contract liquidates a portion to keep the system solvent. This model keeps custody on-chain but is sensitive to crypto market stress and oracle reliability.

3) Algorithmic (caution required)

#

These try to balance supply and demand with incentives rather than full reserves. In benign markets, the peg can hold. Under stress, incentives can break down and trigger a “death spiral.” The TerraUSD collapse in 2022 is the textbook example.

USDT, USDC, and RLUSD (What I Actually Use)

#

USDT (Tether). The liquidity king—you’ll find it listed everywhere, on multiple chains, with deep markets. Tether posts a transparency dashboard and periodic attestations; the scale of USDT means it’s constantly scrutinized by media and analysts. I treat USDT as tactically useful due to its ubiquity, while still minding issuer risk.

USDC (Circle). Positioned around compliance and transparency with monthly attestations and a reserve structure that includes a government money market fund custodied by a major bank. I favour USDC for fiat on/off-ramps and fintech integrations.

RLUSD (Ripple USD). My current favourite for payments. Ripple launched RLUSD in December 2024, framing it as an enterprise-grade USD stablecoin focused on trust, utility, and compliance. RLUSD is multi-chain (XRPL + Ethereum), publishes third-party reserve attestations, and is being integrated into Ripple Payments for real-world settlement. That combo—payments DNA, reserve discipline, and speed—fits how I use stablecoins day to day.

Ripple, Ripple Labs, XRP, and the XRP Ledger (XRPL) — Explained

#

There’s a lot of conflation in headlines, so here’s the clean separation:

• Ripple Labs, Inc. (“Ripple”) is the company. Ripple builds enterprise payment products and infrastructure aimed at making cross-border transfers behave like email: fast, cheap, and reliable. Its flagship offering today is Ripple Payments (formerly called ODL), used by payment firms and financial institutions.

• XRP is the digital asset native to the XRP Ledger (XRPL). XRP can serve as a bridge asset for moving value between currencies and as a highly liquid, low-fee medium for transfers.

• The XRP Ledger (XRPL) is a public, decentralized blockchain optimized for payments with low fees and fast finality. It supports issued tokens (like RLUSD on XRPL), a built-in DEX, and more. XRPL runs independently of Ripple the company; it’s open-source and community-driven.

• RLUSD is Ripple’s USD stablecoin, issued on XRPL and Ethereum with a stated design emphasis on 1:1 redeemability and transparent, segregated reserves. On XRPL, RLUSD leverages the ledger’s native Issued Tokens model; users create a trust line to the issuer to hold/transfer the token.

Why Stablecoins Can Be Better Than Fiat (My POV)

#

Here’s why I increasingly prefer properly run stablecoins over classic bank transfers:

1. Always-on money. Stablecoins move 24/7/365. No cut-offs, no “come back Monday.”
2. Programmability. You can embed logic into payments: milestone releases, automated escrow, streaming payroll, conditional payouts.
3. Global rails. They ride public networks. Sending a stablecoin to someone in another country can be minutes and cents, not days and mystery fees.
4. Transparency. On-chain flows are auditable, and good issuers publish reserve details and attestations.
5. Composability. One token plugs into exchanges, wallets, and apps without re-establishing banking relationships at each hop.

None of this eliminates risk, but well-designed stablecoins give us the closest thing to internet-speed cash we’ve had.

Where Stablecoins Shine in Real Life

#

• Trading “cash” between moves. Park in a $1 token between buys/sells without going back to fiat.
• Freelance pay and remote teams. Near-instant global payouts, often with lower friction.
• B2B settlement and treasury. Move working capital across entities or regions in minutes, not days.
• Remittances. Clear fees and fast delivery—especially helpful in countries with capital controls or fragile banking.
• On-chain commerce. Stablecoins let e-commerce and marketplaces accept digital dollars with programmable refunds, escrow, and loyalty logic.

I’m especially interested in emerging-market corridors where stablecoins can leapfrog clunky rails. Ripple has been expanding payments partnerships in regions like Africa, and I’m watching RLUSD’s rollout with local partners—exactly the kind of real-world utility I like to see.

The Big Risks (and How I Manage Them)

#

Issuer / Reserve risk. With fiat-backed stablecoins, you trust the issuer to hold high-quality, liquid reserves and honour redemptions. I read attestations, check reserve composition (T-bills vs riskier assets), and note custodians (banks, MMFs). If the issuer is vague or slow to update, I treat that as a red flag.

Banking & Regulatory risk. Rules vary by country and keep evolving. Laws can impact issuers, distributors, and exchanges—including on-/off-ramp access. The practical takeaway for users: prefer issuers that already operate as if high standards were in force—clear disclosures, conservative reserves, and consistent redemption.

De-peg risk. Stress events can knock a stablecoin off $1 temporarily—or catastrophically. Algorithmic designs are the most fragile (TerraUSD showed how quickly incentives can unravel). I diversify issuers, avoid exotic yield schemes, and practise “withdrawal drills” so I know how to get back to fiat quickly.

Smart-contract / Chain risk. Contracts can have bugs. Chains or bridges can suffer outages/exploits. I prefer battle-tested networks, minimize bridging, and keep large balances in the simplest path (native chain, reputable wallets).

How I Choose a Stablecoin (My Checklist)

#

1. Purpose. Am I trading, paying invoices, or parking short-term cash?
2. Issuer transparency. Do they publish regular attestations? What’s the reserve mix? Who are the custodians?
3. Redeemability. Are 1:1 redemption terms clear? Are there minimums, fees, or eligibility requirements?
4. Liquidity. Is it widely listed on the venues I use? (USDT still dominates exchange liquidity in many markets.)
5. Chain support & fees. Is it on the chains I need (e.g., XRPL and Ethereum for RLUSD)? What are typical network fees/confirmation times?
6. Compliance posture. How do blacklisting and AML policies work?
7. Ecosystem fit. Are the wallets, PSPs, and custodians I rely on supported out of the box?

USDT vs USDC vs RLUSD (Side-by-Side)

#

Getting Started: A Beginner Setup I Recommend

#

1. Choose your custody model.

   • Custodial (exchange / fintech app): simplest UX but you’re trusting a platform.
   • Self-custody (you hold keys): more control, more responsibility. Learn how to secure seed phrases properly.

2. Pick the right stablecoin for the job.

   • For payments and low-friction settlement, I currently favour RLUSD—especially on XRPL thanks to speed and fees. For on-/off-ramps or fintech integrations, USDC often fits well. For pure exchange liquidity, USDT is hard to avoid.

3. Buy your first $10 and send it.

   • Start small. Triple-check the network and address. If you’re using XRPL assets, make sure your wallet supports trust lines where applicable (RLUSD on XRPL uses XRPL’s Issued Token model).
   • Do a dry run: send a tiny amount to yourself, confirm it arrives, then scale up.

4. Safety hygiene.

   • Protect seed phrases (offline if possible), beware phishing, keep app permissions lean, and rehearse a recovery/withdrawal path back to fiat.

Advanced: “Earning” on Stablecoins (With Guardrails)

#

Where “yield” comes from: Fiat-backed issuers invest reserves in cash and short-term Treasuries. Typically issuers earn the interest; users don’t earn interest by default (legal framing treats payment stablecoins as digital cash, not bank deposits). If a platform offers “rewards” on stablecoins, there’s counterparty risk and sometimes re-hypothecation behind the scenes. Read terms carefully.

My rules of thumb:

• Treat yield as risk-adjusted, not “free money.”
• Diversify issuers and venues rather than chasing the top APY.
• Keep the majority in simple, liquid setups (no exotic DeFi loops).
• Practise a withdrawal drill: know how to redeem or swap back to fiat fast.

Stablecoins vs CBDCs vs Tokenized Bank Deposits

#

• Stablecoins are issued by private companies or protocols and live on public chains. They’re programmable, composable, and (ideally) fully reserved.
• CBDCs are central-bank digital currencies. Their design choices (privacy, access, programmability) are political and jurisdiction-specific.
• Tokenized bank deposits are existing bank deposits represented as tokens (often on permissioned rails); they inherit bank-deposit characteristics.

For everyday users, the practical question is: “Do I want open-network, programmable money (stablecoins), or bank-native tokens (deposits/CBDCs) tied to specific institutions and jurisdictions?” I suspect we’ll live in a multi-rail world where all three coexist, with stablecoins owning a big chunk of cross-border and developer-led use cases because they’re easiest to build with today.

Common Mistakes I See (So You Can Avoid Them)

#

• Assuming all “$1 coins” are identical. Issuers, reserves, and redemption terms matter.
• Chasing unsustainable yields. If the APY looks magical, the risk is, too.
• Bridging without understanding. Cross-chain bridges add new failure modes; avoid when you can.
• Skipping the docs. Always read an issuer’s transparency page and terms.
• Sending on the wrong network. Double-check chain and address format, especially with multi-chain assets.
• No exit plan. Know how to get back to fiat before you need to. Keep limits, fees, and timelines in a note.

The Future: Where This Is Heading

#

• Enterprise-grade payment rails. Expect more issuers to position stablecoins explicitly as digital cash for payments, with tight reserve discipline and clear redemption—the direction RLUSD has emphasised.
• Emerging-market corridors. Partnerships with local fintechs point to real-world use, not just trading. I’m especially bullish on remittances, B2B payments, and insurance payouts where legacy rails are clunky.
• Clearer policy baselines. Laws and guidance will likely converge on full-reserve, segregated assets, regular attestations, and strict issuer eligibility—improving consumer protection without killing the speed/UX that make stablecoins useful.
• More bank and corporate tokens. Expect tokenized deposits and corporate settlement tokens to blossom alongside public stablecoins. Users won’t care which rail was used—only that money arrived fast, cheap, and predictably.

FAQs (pulled from common beginner questions)

#

1) What is a stablecoin and why is it used? It’s a crypto token designed to stick close to $1, used for fast, low-cost transfers, trading “cash” on exchanges, and cross-border payments.

2) How do stablecoins stay at $1? Either via fiat reserves (cash/T-bills), over-collateralised crypto, or algorithmic incentives (the last category has a poor track record).

3) Are stablecoins safe? Can they crash? They can de-peg under stress. Safety depends on issuer transparency, reserve quality, liquidity, and regulation. Algorithmic models are riskier.

4) What’s the difference between USDT and USDC? Which is better? USDT wins on ubiquity/liquidity; USDC emphasizes disclosures and regulated-fund structures. I choose based on use case: fiat ramps (USDC), exchange liquidity (USDT), and payments (RLUSD).

5) Is RLUSD the same as XRP? No. RLUSD is a USD stablecoin issued by Ripple, while XRP is the native asset of XRPL. RLUSD runs on XRPL (and Ethereum), but it isn’t XRP.

6) Do stablecoins pay interest? Generally no—they’re framed as digital cash. Some platforms offer “rewards”, but that adds counterparty risk. Read the terms.

7) Are stablecoins legal in Australia/U.S.? They’re widely used, but the legal frameworks are evolving. The direction of travel is clearer rules on reserves, redemption, disclosures, and issuer oversight. Always check local guidance and your platform’s licensing.

8) Can I lose money holding stablecoins? Yes—issuer failure, runs, blacklisting, smart-contract bugs, or bridge exploits can cause losses. Diversify and favour clear-reserve issuers.

9) How do I choose a safe stablecoin? Look for attestations, high-quality reserves, clear redemption, broad liquidity, and support from reputable custodians/wallets.

10) Are stablecoins the same as CBDCs? No. CBDCs are central-bank money; stablecoins are private tokens (or protocol-issued) on public chains. They can feel similar in use but differ in governance and design.

My Bottom Line

#

• When stablecoins beat fiat: they’re faster, cheaper, global, and programmable.

• Where they don’t: you’re taking on issuer, policy, and technical risks that a bank deposit doesn’t have.

• How I use them today:

  • RLUSD for everyday payments/settlement (XRPL and Ethereum as needed).
  • USDC where I need clean on/off-ramps or fintech integrations.
  • USDT when liquidity is the deciding factor.

My core rule: read disclosures, understand redemption, and don’t chase yield you don’t need.

Disclaimer

#

This article is for educational purposes only and reflects my personal views and usage. It is not financial, legal, or tax advice. Cryptocurrency involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Always do your own research, read issuer disclosures, and consider professional advice in your jurisdiction before acting.